Daniel Matisoff

Professor, Director of MSEEM Program

Member Of:
  • School of Public Policy
  • Climate and Energy Policy Laboratory
Fax Number:404-385-0504
Office Location: DM Smith 308
Email Address: matisoff@gatech.edu

Overview

Daniel Matisoff teaches and conducts research in the areas of public policy, energy policy, and corporate sustainability. His research focuses on the effectiveness and efficiency of comparative approaches to addressing environmental problems and the adoption and diffusion of energy technologies and policies. He currently is a faculty fellow with the Brook Byers Institute for Sustainability, the Energy Policy and Innovation Center, and serves on the faculty advisory board of the Strategic Energy Institute. He has participated in over $6 million of sponsored research through the National Science Foundation, the European Union Center for Excellence, the German Academic Exchange Service, the Georgia Department of Transportation, and the National Electric Energy Testing Research and Applications Center, among other philanthropies and funded research. His recent research has resulted in publications in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Environmental Research Letters, the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Economic Inquiry, the Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Environmental and Resource Economics, Energy Economics, Environmental Science and Technology, Energy Policy, and Business Strategy and the Environment, among other outlets. His current research interests include: evaluating the effectiveness of voluntary eco-labeling programs; the effectiveness of incentives for solar electricity; the adoption of smart grid technologies and policies; and the impact of large scale solar adoption on consumer rates and bills.

Education:
  • PhD, Indiana University, Public Policy
  • BA, University of Pennsylvania, Economics and International Relations
Areas of
Expertise:
  • Corporate Sustainability
  • Energy Policy
  • Environmental Policy

Interests

Research Fields:
  • Clean Energy
  • Energy Markets
  • Energy, Climate and Environmental Policy
  • Innovation and Diffusion
  • Market-based Incentives
  • Smart Grid
  • Voluntary Programs
Issues:
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Policy Analysis

Courses

  • POL-1101: Government of the U.S.
  • PUBP-2698: Research Assistantship
  • PUBP-3350: Energy Policy
  • PUBP-3600: Sustain,Tech & Policy
  • PUBP-6012: Fund of Policy Processes
  • PUBP-6350: Energy Policy & Markets
  • PUBP-6360: Sust Energy & Env Mgmt
  • PUBP-8540: Adv Environmental Policy

Publications

Selected Publications

Books

Journal Articles

  • Convergence in environmental reporting: Assessing the carbon disclosure project
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: July 2013

    We perform content analysis on Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) responses from 2003 to 2010, focusing on the extent to which firms account for indirect emissions and have exhibited convergence in carbon reporting. We also examine standardization in reporting and the variation of reporting behavior across industry and country. We find that the CDP has produced a mixed record of improved transparency. In some areas, such as Scope 2 emissions, the CDP has demonstrated an increase in transparency in later years. However, the transparency and quality of direct emissions and Scope 3 emissions have not improved over time. Japanese and European Union firms have increased transparency, while American firms have decreased transparency. Energy-intensive industries have either increased transparency or remained the same, while less energy-intensive industries have become less transparent. We demonstrate some evidence of a learning effect among firms after participating in the CDP survey. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

    View All Details about Convergence in environmental reporting: Assessing the carbon disclosure project

  • Performance or marketing benefits? the case of LEED certification
    In: Environmental Science and Technology [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: February 2014

    Green building adoption is driven by both performance-based benefits and marketing based benefits. Performance based benefits are those that improve performance or lower operating costs of the building or of building users. Marketing benefits stem from the consumer response to green certification. This study illustrates the relative importance of the marketing based benefits that accrue to Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) buildings due to green signaling mechanisms, specifically related to the certification itself are identified. Of course, all participants in the LEED certification scheme seek marketing benefits. But even among LEED participants, the interest in green signaling is pronounced. The green signaling mechanism that occurs at the certification thresholds shifts building patterns from just below to just above the threshold level, and motivates builders to cluster buildings just above each threshold. Results are consistent across subsamples, though nonprofit organizations appear to build greener buildings and engage in more green signaling than for-profit entities. Using nonparametric regression discontinuity, signaling across different building types is observed. Marketing benefits due to LEED certification drives organizations to build "greener" buildings by upgrading buildings at the thresholds to reach certification levels. © 2014 American Chemical Society.

    View All Details about Performance or marketing benefits? the case of LEED certification

  • Policy Monitor—Green Buildings: Economics and Policies
    In: Review of Environmental Economics and Policy [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: July 2016

    This article presents an overview of green building economics and policies through a survey of theoretical and empirical evidence concerning green building practices. We define green building policy as policies that affect the entire life of the building, from design and construction to operation and deconstruction. We examine the economics of green buildings in the United States, with particular emphasis on market failures in the building sector such as information problems and externalities. We also discuss how policy instruments are used to address these market failures. We present original data on the types and potential impacts of these policy instruments in the United States, along with a brief review of international green building programs. We conclude by describing challenges for the empirical study of green buildings and priorities for future research and policy in this area.

    View All Details about Policy Monitor—Green Buildings: Economics and Policies

  • Peak Shifting and Cross-Class Subsidization: The Impacts of Solar PV on Changes in Electricity Costs
  • The Comparative Effectiveness of Residential Solar Incentives
  • A Review of Barriers in Implementing Dynamic Electricity Pricing to Achieve Cost-Causality
  • In the LEED: Racing to the Top in Environmental Self-Regulation
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: 2020

    View All Details about In the LEED: Racing to the Top in Environmental Self-Regulation

  • Impacts of Pilot and Demonstration Projects: Evidence from Green Building
    In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: May 2020

    View All Details about Impacts of Pilot and Demonstration Projects: Evidence from Green Building

  • A framework for localizing global climate solutions and their carbon reduction potential
    In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: May 2021

    View All Details about A framework for localizing global climate solutions and their carbon reduction potential

  • Electricity Consumption Changes Following Solar Adoption: Testing for a Solar Rebound
    In: Economic Inquiry [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: January 2023

    We use household level data to explore residential electricity use patterns following installation of solar panels. Solar adoption leads to an increase in total electricity consumption relative to a matched non-adopting control group. Our point estimate translates to a rebound effect of 28.5%, suggesting that nearly a third of the electricity produced by a customer’s solar panels is used for increased energy services, rather than reduced grid electricity consumption. We explore several potential drivers of an increase in electricity consumption. These results have important implications for electricity planning and policy, suggesting that rooftop solar stimulates additional demand for electricity.

    View All Details about Electricity Consumption Changes Following Solar Adoption: Testing for a Solar Rebound

Chapters

All Publications

Books

Journal Articles

  • As the Crow Flies: Tracking policy diffusion through stakeholder networks
    In: Journal of Public Policy [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: October 2023

    View All Details about As the Crow Flies: Tracking policy diffusion through stakeholder networks

  • Electricity Consumption Changes Following Solar Adoption: Testing for a Solar Rebound
    In: Economic Inquiry [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: January 2023

    We use household level data to explore residential electricity use patterns following installation of solar panels. Solar adoption leads to an increase in total electricity consumption relative to a matched non-adopting control group. Our point estimate translates to a rebound effect of 28.5%, suggesting that nearly a third of the electricity produced by a customer’s solar panels is used for increased energy services, rather than reduced grid electricity consumption. We explore several potential drivers of an increase in electricity consumption. These results have important implications for electricity planning and policy, suggesting that rooftop solar stimulates additional demand for electricity.

    View All Details about Electricity Consumption Changes Following Solar Adoption: Testing for a Solar Rebound

  • Contagious COVID-19 policies: Policy diffusion during times of crisis
  • Modernizing the energy infrastructure at federal facilities: Should utilities play a bigger role?
  • Green rules and green tape: Streamlining the environmental review for transportation projects
    In: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: August 2021

    View All Details about Green rules and green tape: Streamlining the environmental review for transportation projects

  • A framework for localizing global climate solutions and their carbon reduction potential
    In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: May 2021

    View All Details about A framework for localizing global climate solutions and their carbon reduction potential

  • Impacts of Pilot and Demonstration Projects: Evidence from Green Building
    In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: May 2020

    View All Details about Impacts of Pilot and Demonstration Projects: Evidence from Green Building

  • A Review of Barriers in Implementing Dynamic Electricity Pricing to Achieve Cost-Causality
  • In the LEED: Racing to the Top in Environmental Self-Regulation
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: 2020

    View All Details about In the LEED: Racing to the Top in Environmental Self-Regulation

  • For what it’s worth: Evaluating revealed preferences for green certification
    In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: 2019

    View All Details about For what it’s worth: Evaluating revealed preferences for green certification

  • Understanding renewable energy policy adoption and evolution in Europe: The impact of coercion, normative emulation, competition, and learning
  • Let sleeping bats lie: Analyzing institutional adaptation to environmental regulatory change through adaptive management theory
  • The influence of task complexity in shaping environmental review and engineering design durations
  • The Comparative Effectiveness of Residential Solar Incentives
  • Peak Shifting and Cross-Class Subsidization: The Impacts of Solar PV on Changes in Electricity Costs
  • Policy Monitor—Green Buildings: Economics and Policies
    In: Review of Environmental Economics and Policy [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: July 2016

    This article presents an overview of green building economics and policies through a survey of theoretical and empirical evidence concerning green building practices. We define green building policy as policies that affect the entire life of the building, from design and construction to operation and deconstruction. We examine the economics of green buildings in the United States, with particular emphasis on market failures in the building sector such as information problems and externalities. We also discuss how policy instruments are used to address these market failures. We present original data on the types and potential impacts of these policy instruments in the United States, along with a brief review of international green building programs. We conclude by describing challenges for the empirical study of green buildings and priorities for future research and policy in this area.

    View All Details about Policy Monitor—Green Buildings: Economics and Policies

  • Understanding drivers of energy efficiency changes in China
    In: Applied Energy [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: August 2015

    © 2016 Elsevier Ltd.Under a total-factor framework, this manuscript constructs a slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis (SBM-DEA) model and an index of total-factor energy efficiency (TFEE) to investigate the energy efficiency of the 29 provincial-administrative regions (PARs) in China during 1997-2011. Applying spatial panel data models to explore the regional clustering and influential factors of energy efficiency in China's 29 provincial-administrative regions during 1997-2011, results show that China experienced a continuing increase in energy efficiency during the sample period. In addition, we find evidence of the diffusion of energy efficiency improvements. Research and development investment, particularly when interacted with increases in energy prices, and when government intervention is low, are a powerful drivers of efficiency improvements. We illustrate heterogeneous impacts across Chinese regions. Income gains in more industrialized provinces and education gains in less industrialized provinces also produce efficiency improvements. In contrast to existing literature, we do not find responsiveness to changes in energy prices, growth rates, or income per capita in less industrialized regions. These results highlight the uniqueness of the Chinese experience and warrant more in-depth exploration of the drivers of energy efficiency in China.

    View All Details about Understanding drivers of energy efficiency changes in China

  • Economic, sociological, and neighbor dimensions of energy efficiency adoption behaviors: Evidence from the US residential heating and air conditioning market
  • Sources of specification errors in the assessment of voluntary environmental programs: understanding program impacts
  • Electric utilities, fuel use, and responsiveness to fuel prices
    In: Energy Economics [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: November 2014
    © 2014 Elsevier B.V.This research tests the impact of changes in fuel price to explain fuel use by electric utilities. We employ a three-stage least squares model that explains changes in fuel use as a function of changes in three fuel prices. This model is repeated across sub-samples of data aggregated at the plant level and operating holding company level. We expect that plants and holding companies reduce fuel use when fuel prices rise. Several fuel substitution effects within and across plants and holding companies are demonstrated, as well as several frictions. At the plant level, higher prices of natural gas lead to less natural gas consumption, less coal consumption, and more fuel oil consumption. At the operating holding company level, results demonstrate the inelasticity of coal use and the increases of natural gas in response to higher coal prices. Subsamples demonstrate heterogeneity of results across different plants. Results emphasize that technological, market, and regulatory frictions may hinder the performance of energy policies.

    View All Details about Electric utilities, fuel use, and responsiveness to fuel prices

  • Performance or marketing benefits? the case of LEED certification
    In: Environmental Science and Technology [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: February 2014

    Green building adoption is driven by both performance-based benefits and marketing based benefits. Performance based benefits are those that improve performance or lower operating costs of the building or of building users. Marketing benefits stem from the consumer response to green certification. This study illustrates the relative importance of the marketing based benefits that accrue to Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) buildings due to green signaling mechanisms, specifically related to the certification itself are identified. Of course, all participants in the LEED certification scheme seek marketing benefits. But even among LEED participants, the interest in green signaling is pronounced. The green signaling mechanism that occurs at the certification thresholds shifts building patterns from just below to just above the threshold level, and motivates builders to cluster buildings just above each threshold. Results are consistent across subsamples, though nonprofit organizations appear to build greener buildings and engage in more green signaling than for-profit entities. Using nonparametric regression discontinuity, signaling across different building types is observed. Marketing benefits due to LEED certification drives organizations to build "greener" buildings by upgrading buildings at the thresholds to reach certification levels. © 2014 American Chemical Society.

    View All Details about Performance or marketing benefits? the case of LEED certification

  • Kindred spirits or intergovernmental competition? The innovation and diffusion of energy policies in the American states (1990–2008)
    In: Environmental Politics [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: 2014
    © 2014, © 2014 Taylor & Francis.The innovation of environmental policies and their subsequent diffusion throughout the American states has been the subject of significant academic attention. Using an event history analysis, a traditional geographic model for policy diffusion is tested against a model where states learn from peer groups, defined by political culture. There is evidence for state learning within peer groups but less support for diffusion across state borders. Policy characteristics, environmental conditions, economic resources, and political constraints and opportunities are tested as drivers of differences in policy adoption. More than any other factor, politics and political culture explains the adoption of energy and climate-change policies. These results also suggest that restricted models that test geographical mechanisms of policy diffusion likely omit important characteristics that are correlated across states, leading to biased findings regarding the geographical state diffusion models in the extant literature.

    View All Details about Kindred spirits or intergovernmental competition? The innovation and diffusion of energy policies in the American states (1990–2008)

  • Convergence in environmental reporting: Assessing the carbon disclosure project
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: July 2013

    We perform content analysis on Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) responses from 2003 to 2010, focusing on the extent to which firms account for indirect emissions and have exhibited convergence in carbon reporting. We also examine standardization in reporting and the variation of reporting behavior across industry and country. We find that the CDP has produced a mixed record of improved transparency. In some areas, such as Scope 2 emissions, the CDP has demonstrated an increase in transparency in later years. However, the transparency and quality of direct emissions and Scope 3 emissions have not improved over time. Japanese and European Union firms have increased transparency, while American firms have decreased transparency. Energy-intensive industries have either increased transparency or remained the same, while less energy-intensive industries have become less transparent. We demonstrate some evidence of a learning effect among firms after participating in the CDP survey. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

    View All Details about Convergence in environmental reporting: Assessing the carbon disclosure project

  • Spatial effects in energy-efficient residential HVAC technology adoption
  • Different rays of sunlight: Understanding information disclosure and carbon transparency
    In: Energy Policy [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: April 2013
    This study assesses the effectiveness of two types information disclosure programs - state-based mandatory carbon reporting programs and the voluntary Carbon Disclosure Project, which uses investor pressure to push firms to disclose carbon emissions and carbon management strategies. I match firms in each program to control groups of firms that have not participated in each program. Using panel data methods and a difference in differences specification, I measure the impact of each program on plant-level carbon emissions, plant-level carbon intensity, and plant level output. I find that neither program has generated an impact on plant-level carbon emissions, emissions intensity, or output. Placing this study in contrast with others that demonstrate improvements from mandatory information disclosure, these results suggest that how information is reported to stakeholders has important implications for program effectiveness. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

    View All Details about Different rays of sunlight: Understanding information disclosure and carbon transparency

  • Privatizing Climate Change Policy: Is there a Public Benefit?
    In: Environmental and Resource Economics [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: November 2012
    The Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) and the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) are two private voluntary initiatives aimed at reducing carbon emissions and improving carbon management by firms. I sample power plants from firms participating in each of these programs, and match these to plants belonging to non-participating firms, to control for differences between participating and non-participating plants. Using a difference-in-differences model to control for unobservable differences between participants and non-participants, and to control for the trajectory of emissions prior to program participation, I find that the CCX is associated with a decrease in total carbon dioxide emissions for participating plants when non-publicly traded firms are included in the sample. Effects are produced largely by decreases in output. CCX participation is associated with increases in carbon dioxide intensity. The CDP is not associated with a decrease of carbon dioxide emissions or electricity generation, and program participation is associated with an increase in carbon dioxide intensity. I explore these results within the context of voluntary environmental programs to address carbon emissions. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

    View All Details about Privatizing Climate Change Policy: Is there a Public Benefit?

  • Managing contested greenspace: neighborhood commons and the rise of dog parks
    In: International Journal of the Commons [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: 2012

    View All Details about Managing contested greenspace: neighborhood commons and the rise of dog parks

  • Are international environmental agreements enforceable? Implications for institutional design
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: February 2010
    Over the past several decades, European international environmental institutions have evolved, heeding institutionalist calls for stronger institutions backed by sanctioning and dispute settlement mechanisms. This apparent increase in institutional strength has led to a corresponding increase of the behavioral effectiveness, or active compliance management of institutions as observed in the incidence of arbitral tribunal decisions. However, upon closer examination, it is apparent that this behavioral effectiveness has not been exclusively due to provisions for arbitral tribunal decisions within international environmental agreements. Rather, the incidence and enforcement of these arbitral tribunal decisions is linked to the institutional design of the enforcement mechanisms. Most international environmental agreements rely on parties to raise disputes and enforce commitments, causing individual countries to bear the cost of enforcement. In addition, bringing a dispute to an arbitral tribunal requires the accordance of the parties to the dispute. In contrast, the European Court of Justice allows for enforcement to originate from a strong central authority and for the cases of arbitration to be filed unilaterally. International environmental agreements that have been joined by the European Community and have a provision for an arbitral tribunal have stronger enforcement mechanisms, are more likely to result in enforcement action, and are more effective in generating behavioral change. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

    View All Details about Are international environmental agreements enforceable? Implications for institutional design

  • Making cap-and-trade work: Lessons from the european union experience
    In: Environment [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: December 2009
    With a new administration in Washington and a new consensus that carbon dioxide emissions are causing catastrophic climate change, it is becoming clear that the United States will soon adopt some form of market-based regulation scheme. Though many would argue that the United States should have instituted a regulatory scheme years ago, the country will reap one distinct advantage from having a late start: the ability to learn from the European Union's ambitious efforts to tackle the problem of industrial carbon emissions for nearly five years.There are many ways that governments and other regulating bodies can regulate and control industrial carbon emissions, but two of the main methods are the traditional "command and control" strategy in which government sets unwavering limits on how much carbon each business can emit, and a system of "tradable emissions permits"-sometimes called cap and trade-in which a government sets an emissions limit, or cap, for each business or industry and issues permits that correspond to the allowed emissions amounts. Businesses within the system can buy and sell emissions permits to each other, enabling those who need and can afford to emit more carbon to do so without the overall limit being exceeded.

    View All Details about Making cap-and-trade work: Lessons from the european union experience

  • The adoption of state climate change policies and renewable portfolio standards: Regional diffusion or internal determinants?
    In: Review of Policy Research [Peer Reviewed]
    Date: December 2008
    This paper draws upon policy innovation literature and quantitatively explains the adoption of state climate change policies, leading to a broader question - what makes states more likely to adopt policies that provide a global public good? First, existing empirical evidence relating to state climate change policy adoption is reviewed. Following this brief discussion, several analytic approaches are presented that test specific hypotheses derived from the internal determinants and regional diffusion models of policy adoption. Policy diffusion is tested as a function of the motivations, resources, and obstacles of policy change. Motivations for policy innovation include environmental conditions and demands of citizens. Resources include state financial and geographic resources, such as wind and solar potential. Obstacles include a state's reliance on carbon-intensive industries such as coal and natural gas. The results show that internal factors, particularly citizens' demands, are stronger predictors of states' policies than are diffusion effects from neighboring states. © 2008 Policy Studies Organization.

    View All Details about The adoption of state climate change policies and renewable portfolio standards: Regional diffusion or internal determinants?

  • Park user characteristics, attitudes, and quasi-voluntary behavior

Chapters